All Bugs Are Fixed
Switch Theme
Blog Post

Measuring the cost of commuting

General
1 min read
ProcessVisualization

Outline: The high cost of commuting

This post explores the personal and economic toll of commuting, utilizing tracked data and cost analysis.

1. Thesis

  • Core Argument: Commuting is a “soul suck,” a waste of personal time, and a significant waste of economic resources.
  • Goal: To quantify these costs using real-world data and extrapolation.

2. Data collection & methodology

  • Tracking:
    • Rudimentary tracking of commute times and legs from home to work.
    • Reality Check: I used poor tools and didn’t invest in better ones (e.g., Amp Flow, personal app).
    • Method: Primarily a stopwatch on my phone.
    • Challenge: Data is sometimes sampled, sometimes forgotten.
    • Precision vs. Accuracy: Discussion on the reliability of the dataset (highly accurate samples vs. consistent daily precision).
  • Privacy:
    • Methodology for masking the exact starting location while still providing valuable insights into travel times and density.
    • Data presented as coarse-grained times for each leg.

3. Planned visualizations & data sources

  • Commute Maps: Visualizing travel density and time variance.
  • Specific Legs:
    • Visualizing each leg and commute method: Drive & Park vs. Drive Dropoff.
    • Comparisons: Bike vs. Walk vs. Bus vs. Train.
    • Note: We’ve already mostly self-optimized.
  • External Data:
    • Metra: Looking at train data (if available).
    • Chicago Maps: Overlays of bike and bus maps to visualize downtown commute methods.
  • Divvy Bikes (Potential):
    • Scraping Divvy data to correlate distances and duration.
    • Comparing personal tracked times against public bike-share data.

4. Cost & time analysis

  • Time Extrapolation:
    • Calculating total time spent commuting per year.
    • “Time Back”: How much free time could be reclaimed daily/monthly without this commute?
  • Economic Impact:
    • Comparing direct costs (transit/fuel) vs. opportunity costs.
    • Opportunity Costs: Lost time, impact on health, family time, and more.

5. Feasibility of activities

Addressing common anecdotes (e.g., “Can’t you just read or work on the train?”).

  • Constraints:
    • Train: Jerkiness, seating availability, embarking/disembarking time, actual time available for deep work.
    • Biking: Safety concerns (helmets, traffic awareness), inability to safely listen to audiobooks/podcasts while navigating city streets.
    • Conclusion: Most “productive” activities are non-feasible during these commutes.